home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
QRZ! Ham Radio 4
/
QRZ Ham Radio Callsign Database - Volume 4.iso
/
digests
/
tcp
/
940081.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1994-11-13
|
4KB
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 94 04:30:01 PDT
From: Advanced Amateur Radio Networking Group <tcp-group@ucsd.edu>
Errors-To: TCP-Group-Errors@UCSD.Edu
Reply-To: TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: TCP-Group Digest V94 #81
To: tcp-group-digest
TCP-Group Digest Sat, 30 Apr 94 Volume 94 : Issue 81
Today's Topics:
empty sockets?
LZW compressed sockets on KA9Q ,Pa0gri NOS (2 msgs)
TCP-Group Digest V94 #80
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu>.
Subscription requests to <TCP-Group-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>.
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the TCP-Group Digest are available
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri Apr 29 16:55:41 1994
From: rbates@inquire.pixar.com (Rick Bates)
Subject: empty sockets?
To: tcp-group@UCSD.EDU
Hi all.
This may have already been reported here, but I noticed the other night when
trying to move mail on a slow channel, that every time I used the 'remote'
command to 'kick' the other end, a socket was opened. Each socket stayed open
even after the connection was closed.
While it didn't appear to affect anything, the socket count went up and stayed
up. Is this anything that matters?
Rick, WA6NHC
rbates@inquire.pixar.com
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 94 21:52:11 +02
From: "Alessandro Agostini" <agostini@ir5tcp.iroe.fi.cnr.it>
Subject: LZW compressed sockets on KA9Q ,Pa0gri NOS
To: TCP-Group@ucsd.edu
Hello,
I have tried to introduce an LZW compression in telnet in a KA9Q/Pa0gri 2.0p
NOS version. The result is good in ham-radio use as no one on air can see
your login and password. But i met this problem: the LZW-compressed socket
works ok in telnet in both directions as long as no side tries to negotiate
telnet options (IAC, DO, WILL, WONT, DONT ...). But if this happens,
for example when the socked is worked in binary (not cooked mode) with
no local echo , lzw protocol error occur. Any of you have found something
similar ? Any suggestions ?
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 1994 17:41:08 -0400
From: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@alter.net>
Subject: LZW compressed sockets on KA9Q ,Pa0gri NOS
To: agostini@ir5tcp.iroe.fi.cnr.it
> I have tried to introduce an LZW compression in telnet in a KA9Q/Pa0gri 2.0p
> NOS version. The result is good in ham-radio use as no one on air can see
> your login and password.
Of course, it would be trivial to break this "security". This alone is
certainly not a good reason to use LZW compression.
louie
WA3YMH
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 1994 14:59:21 +0100 (BST)
From: M.Willis@ee.surrey.ac.uk
Subject: TCP-Group Digest V94 #80
To: TCP-Group@ucsd.edu
I am having trouble making JNOS 1.10b work. Can anyone give me a
config.nos file to look at. I am trying to run it on 2 ports, one a kiss
mode MFJ1278 and the other a baycom.
It appears to work but FTP sessions fail after a time and it goes very
slowly. The T1 timer becomes very large very quickly and no fiddling with
maxwait will sort it. How can the software to be mad eto send files
quickly on dedicated freqs?
Mike
------------------------------
End of TCP-Group Digest V94 #81
******************************